· 10/9/1997
People v. Plair
Citations
- 686 N.E.2d 28
- 292 Ill. App. 3d 396
- 226 Ill. Dec. 679
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding Robinson’s conclusion that a defendant may receive credit against two sentences for time spent simultaneously in detention on two charges inapplicable to concurrent sentences
- finding Robinson 's conclusion that a defendant may receive credit against two sentences for time spent simultaneously in detention on two charges inapplicable to concurrent sentences
- allowing sentence credit against consecutive sentences for the same time period “essentially allows a defendant to receive credit for double the amount of time served and converts much of a consecutive sentence into a concurrent one”
- allowing sentence credit against consecutive sentences for the same time period \essentially allows a defendant to receive credit for double the amount of time served and converts much of a consecutive sentence into a concurrent one\
- when defense counsel expressly consents to a particular trial setting, the delay up to that date is attributable to the defendant
- when defense counsel expressly consents to a particular trial setting, the delay up to that date is attributable to the defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rarick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.