Skip to main content
· 10/9/1997

People v. Plair

Citations

  • 686 N.E.2d 28
  • 292 Ill. App. 3d 396
  • 226 Ill. Dec. 679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding Robinson’s conclusion that a defendant may receive credit against two sentences for time spent simultaneously in detention on two charges inapplicable to concurrent sentences
  • finding Robinson 's conclusion that a defendant may receive credit against two sentences for time spent simultaneously in detention on two charges inapplicable to concurrent sentences
  • allowing sentence credit against consecutive sentences for the same time period “essentially allows a defendant to receive credit for double the amount of time served and converts much of a consecutive sentence into a concurrent one”
  • allowing sentence credit against consecutive sentences for the same time period \essentially allows a defendant to receive credit for double the amount of time served and converts much of a consecutive sentence into a concurrent one\
  • when defense counsel expressly consents to a particular trial setting, the delay up to that date is attributable to the defendant
  • when defense counsel expressly consents to a particular trial setting, the delay up to that date is attributable to the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rarick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.