Skip to main content

People v. Payne

Citations

  • 689 N.E.2d 631
  • 294 Ill. App. 3d 254
  • 228 Ill. Dec. 572
  • 1998 Ill. App. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when a defendant agrees to a potential range of sentences, defendant implicitly concedes that a sentence imposed within the range cannot be excessive and that defendant is entitled to complain only if the agreement has been broken
  • holding that when a defendant agrees to a potential range of sentences, defendant implicitly concedes that a sentence imposed within the range cannot be excessive and that defendant is entitled to complain only if the agreement has been broken
  • holding that when a defendant agrees to a poten­tial range of sen­tenc­es, defendant implicit­ly con­cedes that a sentence imposed within the range cannot be exces­sive and that defendant is entitled to complain only if the agreement has been broken
  • “However, where a defendant asserts in the trial court more than a general claim that his sentence is excessive, he is allowed to raise that issue by a motion to reconsider sentence.”
  • “However, where a defendant - 11 - asserts in the trial court more than a general claim that his sentence is excessive, he is allowed to raise that issue by a motion to reconsider sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.