Skip to main content

People v. Salgado

Citations

  • 678 N.E.2d 648
  • 287 Ill. App. 3d 432
  • 222 Ill. Dec. 776
  • 1997 Ill. App. LEXIS 146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in a case involving first-degree murder, the nickname “Bam Bam” did not carry a negative connotation that was immediately recognizable
  • holding that in a case involving first-degree murder, the nickname \Bam Bam\ did not carry a negative connotation that was immediately recognizable
  • holding that use of defendant’s nickname of “Bam Bam” was not improper where the name itself did not carry a negative connotation that was immediately recognizable and where defendant’s friends knew and identified him by that name
  • use of nickname “Bam Bam” was not prejudicial error because it did not carry a negative connotation and witnesses knew and identified defendant by that name
  • use of nickname \Bam Bam\ was not prejudicial error because it did not carry a negative connotation and witnesses knew and identified defendant by that name

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolfson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.