People v. Payne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant failed to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel because he “merely speculated that an independent expert could have provided favorable testimony”
• holding that the defendant failed to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel because he “merely speculated that an independent expert could have provided favorable testimony”
• holding that the defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the defendant wearing leg shackles during trial because the defendant failed to show that the jury observed the shackles
• stating that the failure to provide any argument or analysis of any argument results in the issue being abandoned
• observing that a claim alleging ineffective assistance of counsel was preserved because the defendant moved for a new trial or a Ginther hearing in the trial court
• stating that counsel’s competence may not be assessed with the benefit of hindsight

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).