Appellate Court of Illinois· 9/21/2001

People v. Pippen

Citations

756 N.E.2d 474
324 Ill. App. 3d 649
258 Ill. Dec. 492
2001 Ill. App. LEXIS 741

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that a reference to “the nature of [the defendant’s] prior convictions and his plea of guilty” did not sufficiently preserve sentencing issues raised on appeal
finding that a reference to “the nature of [the defendant’s] prior convictions and his plea of guilty” did not sufficiently preserve sentencing issues raised on appeal
“The existence of mitigating factors does not require the trial court to reduce a sentence from the maximum allowed”
\A court has abused its discretion when the record shows the sentence is excessive and not justified under any reasonable view of the record.\
“A court has abused its discretion when the record shows the sentence is excessive and not justified under any reasonable view of the record.”
“A defendant’s rehabilitative potential and other mitigating factors are not entitled to greater weight than the seriousness of the offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Myerscough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Pippen

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.