Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/31/1992

People v. Burrell

Citations

592 N.E.2d 453
228 Ill. App. 3d 133
170 Ill. Dec. 17
1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 489

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

a factor to be considered is “whether [the defendant] has cooperated with appointed counsel even though dissatisfied with that counsel”
no abuse of discretion in denying defendant’s motion on the day of trial to substitute counsel, where eleven months was “ample time to retain private counsel”
the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion on the day of trial to substitute counsel, where eleven months was “ample time to retain private counsel”
“The trial court does not abuse its discretion in denying a motion if chosen counsel is not specifically identified or does not stand ‘ready, willing and able’ to enter an appearance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cerda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.