Michigan Court of Appeals· 10/20/1981
People v. Nash
Citations
- 313 N.W.2d 307
- 110 Mich. App. 428
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no violation of defendant’s attorney-client privilege in requiring attorney to relinquish physical evidence, but testimony that evidence obtained pursuant to search of attorney’s office violated privilege because infers the defendant gave evidence to attorney
- abandonment element in property law case was fact question
- abandonment element in property law case was fact question
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burns, MacKenzie, Kallman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hankins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-01· cited 274×
- Paula McFarland v. Joan YukinsSixth Circuit· 2004-01-23· cited 236×
- People v. NashMichigan Supreme Court· 1983-12-19· cited 147×
- People v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court· 1995-08-09· cited 144×
- State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court· 2015-03-02· cited 106×
- Rubin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-06· cited 102×
- Taylor v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals· 1994-06-20· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. StenhachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-31· cited 32×
- Hitch v. Pima County Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1985-10-01· cited 18×
- People v. SchaubMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-02-20· cited 15×
- People v. CastleMichigan Court of Appeals· 1983-06-06· cited 14×
- People v. BryantMichigan Court of Appeals· 1983-10-11· cited 8×
- People v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals· 1985-12-17· cited 7×
- McFarland v. YukinsSixth Circuit· 2004-01-23
- Commonwealth v. CinelliMassachusetts Superior Court· 2014-04-16
Cites
51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-01-31· cited 3,238×
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 3,107×
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court· 1964-03-30· cited 3,077×
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 2,425×
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 1,583×
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 1,576×
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 1,468×
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court· 1921-06-01· cited 1,253×
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-04-03· cited 891×
- Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 745×
- People v. HamptonMichigan Supreme Court· 1979-11-26· cited 474×
- People v. ReedMichigan Supreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 263×
- People v. BeaversMichigan Supreme Court· 1975-04-07· cited 163×
- People v. ChismMichigan Supreme Court· 1973-10-17· cited 158×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.