Skip to main content

People v. Nash

Citations

  • 313 N.W.2d 307
  • 110 Mich. App. 428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no violation of defendant’s attorney-client privilege in requiring attorney to relinquish physical evidence, but testimony that evidence obtained pursuant to search of attorney’s office violated privilege because infers the defendant gave evidence to attorney
  • abandonment element in property law case was fact question
  • abandonment element in property law case was fact question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, MacKenzie, Kallman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.