Taylor v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to conclude that the defendant’s conduct was outrageous even though the defendant’s conduct of erroneously refusing to pay for the plaintiff’s chemotherapy treatments resulted in delayed treatments which caused the plaintiff’s cancer to spread throughout her body
• where a party did not provide pertinent deposition testimony, issue considered abandoned on appeal
• this Court reviews a trial court’s factual findings for clear error
• discussing abuse of discretion standard with respect to rebuttal evidence
• discussing abuse of discretion standard with respect to rebuttal evidence
• “Failure to pay a contractual obligation does not amount to outrageous conduct, even if it is willful or in bad faith. At best, plaintiffs’ claim lies in the tort of bad-faith refusal to pay an insurance claim, an action that is not recognized by the courts of this state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).