Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/3/2005
People v. Mitchell
Citations
- 824 N.E.2d 642
- 355 Ill. App. 3d 1030
- 291 Ill. Dec. 786
- 2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 219
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a reasonable person would not have felt free to leave when police were holding his identification in order to run a warrant check
- concluding that officer’s retention of defendant’s identification to run computer warrant check following consensual police-citizen encounter constituted seizure within meaning of Fourth Amendment
- \State correctly points out that an encounter between the police and a citizen does not become nonconsensual merely because the police ask a few questions or ask the citizen for identification.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grometer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. LuedemannIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-10-05· cited 525×
- State v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2012-12-13· cited 93×
- People v. BrendlinCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-11-24· cited 71×
- State v. GraysonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2011-03-29· cited 67×
- Golphin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-12-14· cited 58×
- State v. FriersonSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-02-09· cited 57×
- State v. SotoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-01-08· cited 39×
- State v. SotoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-02-28· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. LylesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-05-15· cited 35×
- State v. MoralezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-05-17· cited 35×
- People v. LuedemannAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-05-04· cited 33×
- People v. BeverlyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-03-23· cited 33×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-05-17· cited 28×
- State v. HummonsArizona Supreme Court· 2011-06-10· cited 25×
- People v. ShippAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-07-28· cited 19×
- People v. NashAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-03-31· cited 15×
- People v. QueenAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-11-28· cited 12×
- People v. JamesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-05-05· cited 11×
- People v. DittmarAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-06-15· cited 10×
- State v. StrieffUtah Supreme Court· 2015-01-16· cited 9×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- People v. SorensonIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-06-21· cited 440×
- State v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court· 2000-01-31· cited 408×
- People v. GhernaIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-01-24· cited 268×
- Haudrich v. Howmedica, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court· 1996-01-18· cited 258×
- People v. GonzalezIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-04-17· cited 219×
- United States v. David Lee GreenSeventh Circuit· 1997-06-03· cited 216×
- People v. MurrayIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-05-30· cited 196×
- People v. TurnageIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-10-27· cited 67×
- People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-11-20· cited 59×
- State v. ChisholmCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-02-28· cited 58×
- People v. HallAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-09-03· cited 52×
- Salt Lake City v. RayCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2000-03-02· cited 45×
- People v. LaakeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-05-04· cited 24×
- People v. TorresAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-03-19· cited 14×
- People v. DionesotesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-09-25· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.