Tennessee Supreme Court· 1/31/2000

State v. Daniel

Citations

12 S.W.3d 420
2000 Tenn. LEXIS 52
2000 WL 100069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the “encounter did not become a seizure simply because [the defendant] may have felt inherent social pressure to cooperate”
holding that no seizure occurs when an officer approaches a vehicle in a public place and asks questions of the occupant
holding that a consensual encounter “mature[d] into a seizure” when an officer retained possession of the defendant’s license to run a warrants check
holding that an officer’s pursuit of an “individual who has attempted to terminate the contact by departing” constitutes a seizure
concluding that police may approach an individual in a public place, or in a parked car, and ask questions without implicating constitutional protections, but that a “seizure” occurs if an officer retains the individual’s identification
recognizing that courts have typically held that an encounter between a police officer and a citizen becomes a “seizure” if an officer: (1) pursues an individual who has attempted to terminate the contact by departing; . . . (4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Drowota, Anderson, Barker, Byers, Birch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

377 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Daniel

94 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.