Salt Lake City v. Ray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because there was no reasonable articulable suspicion for officers to retain individual’s identification for about five minutes while running a warrant check, the seizure violated the individual's rights under the Fourth Amendment
• holding that first officer's possession of pedestrian's i.d. to run warrant check when second officer sought consent to search constituted seizure which vitiated consent, noting that \critical time at issue [was] . . . when [the pedestrian] consented to the search\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).