Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/31/2011
People v. Nash
Citations
- 947 N.E.2d 350
- 409 Ill. App. 3d 342
- 349 Ill. Dec. 713
- 2011 Ill. App. LEXIS 311
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An impoundment must either be supported by probable cause or be consistent with the police role as ‘caretaker’ of the streets and completely unrelated to an ongoing criminal investigation.”
- inventory search proper because impoundment of vehicle mandated by traffic laws
- impoundment of the vehicle upon the defendant’s arrest was proper because the teenage passenger did not offer proof that she had a valid driver’s license and liability insurance on the vehicle to lawfully remove the car from the scene
- describing standards for impoundment and inventory searches
- describing standards for impoundment and inventory searches
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burke, Bowman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. LeFloreAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-09-17· cited 21×
- Ralph Laverne Hunnicutt-Carter v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2013-08-29· cited 13×
- People v. FerrisAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-06-09· cited 6×
- People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-05-06· cited 6×
- ABF Freight System v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois· 2016-02-19· cited 6×
- American Service Insurance Company v. AriveAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-09-20· cited 5×
- People v. PartinAppellate Court of Illinois· 2022-06-02· cited 3×
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Rockford Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-06-17· cited 1×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court· 2009-04-21· cited 2,725×
- Soldal v. Cook CountySupreme Court· 1992-12-08· cited 1,151×
- Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2004-05-24· cited 660×
- People v. DonohoIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-04-03· cited 617×
- People v. LuedemannIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-10-05· cited 525×
- Jorge Miranda Irene Miranda v. City of Cornelius Acme Towing, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2005-11-17· cited 212×
- People v. CosbyIllinois Supreme Court· 2008-09-18· cited 207×
- United States v. Christopher DuguaySeventh Circuit· 1996-10-31· cited 184×
- People v. DavisonIllinois Supreme Court· 2009-04-02· cited 168×
- People v. McDonoughIllinois Supreme Court· 2010-11-18· cited 157×
- People v. LampitokIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-09-18· cited 144×
- People v. GipsonIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-02-21· cited 112×
- People v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-03-03· cited 49×
- Lamar Whiteco Outdoor Corp. v. City of West ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-02-08· cited 40×
- People v. HundleyIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-08-26· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.