Illinois Supreme Court· 6/19/2008

People v. Lopez

Citations

892 N.E.2d 1047
229 Ill. 2d 322
323 Ill. Dec. 55
2008 Ill. LEXIS 630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a retrial raises double jeopardy concerns requiring us to consider the sufficiency of the evidence
holding that court was “required” to consider sufficiency of the evidence against defendant notwithstanding his failure to contest it where court was remanding for a new trial
holding that court was “required” to consider sufficiency of the evidence against defendant notwithstanding his failure to contest it where court was remanding for a new trial
finding that a rational trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt based on the now-suppressed confession and other corroborating circumstances
finding that a rational trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt based on the now-suppressed confession and other corroborating circumstances
explaining that where a case is reversed because of admission of improper evidence, a remand for retrial “raises double jeopardy concerns, and we are therefore required to consider the sufficiency of the evidence against defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzgerald, Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.