Skip to main content

People v. King

Citations

  • 618 N.E.2d 709
  • 248 Ill. App. 3d 253
  • 188 Ill. Dec. 139
  • 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for resentencing when defendant was sentenced four years before the sentence was vacated
  • the charging instrument does not constitute evidence and does not create an inference of guilt
  • defense counsel reminded the jury about the State’s burden “no less than 25 times.”
  • testimony about defendant’s match to sex offender profile was inadmissible
  • testimony about defendant's match to sex offender profile was inadmissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.