People v. Columbo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where court cited Goodman for the proposition that the fact one party to the conversation was a government agent did not eliminate the conspiracy
• “Volunteered or spontaneous statements, as opposed to admissions elicited by custodial interrogation, are expressly excepted from the requirements of Miranda.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
• “Volunteered or spontaneous statements, as opposed to admissions elicited by custodial interrogation, are expressly excepted from the requirements of Miranda.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
• where court cited Goodman for the proposition that the fact one party to the conversation was a government agent did not elimi- nate the conspiracy
• where the court noted that the witness “qualified her testimony *** by stating, ‘As far as I can remember’ and ‘Not that I recall’ ” in questioning whether intentional misrepresentation occurred
• the derivative issue of perjury was not proved where the false statements were not material to the issue in question and where no showing was made that the facts were “intentionally misrepresented”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).