Appellate Court of Illinois· 5/25/1982

People v. Barbour

Citations

436 N.E.2d 667
106 Ill. App. 3d 993
62 Ill. Dec. 641
1982 Ill. App. LEXIS 1933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding evidence of other crimes inadmissible when identity is not at issue
holding evidence of other crimes inadmissible when identity is not at issue
holding evidence of other crimes inadmissible when identity is not at issue
finding that consent was a matter of credibility and that the fact that “two of defendant’s former victims testified that they did not consent to defendant’s sexual advances is wholly irrelevant to this issue of this complainant’s consent”
although often used interchangeably, the concepts “common design” and “modus operandi” are quite distinguishable
“The issue of consent (or lack thereof) is ultimately a matter of credibility, a question best left to the trier of fact who heard the evidence and saw the demeanor of the witnesses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stamos, Downing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Barbour

14 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.