Skip to main content

People v. J.J.C.

Citations

  • 294 Ill. App. 3d 227
  • 689 N.E.2d 1172
  • 228 Ill. Dec. 751
  • 1998 Ill. App. LEXIS 11

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when a juvenile’s parents are present and request to confer with their child, and they are effectively refused access to the child, the presumption arises that the juvenile’s will was overborne
  • holding that when a juvenile’s parents are present and request to confer with their child, and they are effectively refused access to the child, the presumption arises that the juvenile’s will was overborne
  • noting that the record was silent on whether the youth officer affirmatively protected respondent minor’s rights
  • noting that the record was silent on whether the youth officer affirmatively protected respondent minor’s rights
  • stating that juvenile’s prior minimal contacts with the police did not give him the sophistication or insight on how to conduct himself while being interrogated by the police in a criminal matter
  • stating that juvenile's prior minimal contacts with the police did not give him the sophistication or insight on how to conduct himself while being interrogated by the police in a criminal matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hutchinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.