People v. L.L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the record indicated the youth officer failed to demonstrate any interest in the minor’s welfare and was instead adversarial and antagonistic toward the respondent
• stating that the court could not accept State’s implied theory that parents were not interested in seeing and conferring with their son, where they drove to the police station in the middle of the night
• stating that the court could not accept State’s implied theory that parents were not interested in seeing and conferring with their son, where they drove to the police station in the middle of the night
• the record and trial court’s comments revealed that youth officer showed no interest in minor’s welfare
• the record and trial court’s comments revealed that youth officer showed no interest in minor’s welfare
• a youth officer cannot be adversarial or antagonistic toward the juvenile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).