Skip to main content

People v. Christopher K.

Citations

  • 810 N.E.2d 145
  • 284 Ill. Dec. 492
  • 348 Ill. App. 3d 130
  • 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the term “offense,” as used in section 5—810, is not unconstitutionally vague
  • finding that the EJJP statute was not vague, the appellate court held that a juvenile violates the “conditions of his or her sentence” by a “failure to comply with the juvenile sentence”
  • holding the term “offense,” as used in section 5–810, is not unconstitutionally vague
  • “we find the legislature must have meant ‘offense’ as a criminal offense as such is defined in the Criminal Code”
  • 348 Ill.App.3d at 142-43, 284 Ill.Dec. 492, 810 N.E.2d 145

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Reid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

82 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.