Quintano v. People

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that separate offenses occurred where the defendant “persisted after the victim admonished him to stop several times”
• noting that a reviewing court looks to the evidence introduced at trial to determine whether the evidence was sufficient to support separate and distinct offenses
• concluding that five acts of sexual assault were factually distinct and thus supported separate offenses because, among other things, each act was separate in time and constituted a new volitional departure in the defendant's course of conduct
• holding that the evidence supported five separate charged offenses of sexual assault because the defendant committed each act at a different location, had time to reflect after each incident, and significant time elapsed between the incidents
• noting that in determining whether offenses are factually distinct, we may consider whether the prosecution treated the acts as legally separable
• stating that the court must “look to all 19 the evidence introduced at trial to determine whether the evidence on which the jury relied for conviction was sufficient to support distinct and separate offenses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).