Michigan Supreme Court· 7/29/1997

People v. Grove

Citations

566 N.W.2d 547
455 Mich. 439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

discussing with approval a federal case where the court strictly adhered to scheduling deadlines even though the parties were “only one day late”
discussing with approval a federal case where the court strictly adhered to scheduling deadlines even though the parties were “only one day late”
agreeing with the court of appeals that the use of a plea cutoff date ‘enhanced [the court’s] docket control, eliminated unjustifiable expense and delay, and was, therefore, proper’
\[A] prosecutor's determination of what charges to bring is subject to judicial review only for an abuse of power ....\
“rejection of a tardy plea is within the discretion of a trial court,” where plea was presented 1 day before trial and over 1 month after plea cutoff date
“We conclude that rejection of a tardy plea is within the discretion of a trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Malt, Brickley, Riley, Weaver, Boyle, Cavanagh, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Grove

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.