Skip to main content

People v. Jasper

Citations

  • 17 P.3d 807
  • 2001 WL 66231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a party must establish good cause when it misses a plea cutoff bargain deadline the court has established under its inherent authority
  • determining that “mere renegotiation or a change of mind by the parties” would not ordinarily establish good cause for tardy plea
  • “[T]he setting of deadlines for pretrial matters constitutes an integral part of a trial court’s case management authority.”
  • “[T]he setting of deadlines for pretrial matters constitutes an integral part of a trial court’s case management authority.”
  • “One *** limitation on the trial court’s discretion to enforce a plea deadline is the requirement that the parties must have adequate notice of the deadline”
  • \One * * * limitation on the trial court's discretion to enforce a plea deadline is the requirement that the parties must have adequate notice of the deadline\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.