Michigan Supreme Court· 7/26/2018
People v. Smith
Citations
- 918 N.W.2d 718
- 502 Mich. 624
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- vacating as moot the part of the Court of Appeals’ judgment holding a resignation provision to be invalid because the defendant had resigned from office prior to the Court of Appeals’ decision
- “[T]he law has long been clear that there is no property interest in holding public office.”
- “the law has long been clear that there is no property interest in holding public office.”
- “[T]he law has long been clear that there is no property interest in holding public office.”
- “A dispute is moot if no controversy exists and any judgment on the matter would lack practical legal effect.”
- in which a majority of the Court agreed, as a matter of first impression, that a “bar-to-office” plea agreement violates public policy under the common law in certain circumstances
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bench, Clement, Viviano
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- James Fouts v. Warren City CouncilSixth Circuit· 2024-04-02· cited 31×
- People of Michigan v. Eric John RydzewskiMichigan Court of Appeals· 2020-01-23
- People of Michigan v. Virgil SmithMichigan Supreme Court· 2020-05-01
- Senate v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court· 2020-12-29
- People of Michigan v. Eric Arlington OgilvieMichigan Court of Appeals· 2022-03-03
- Soaring Pine Capital Real Estate v. Park Street Group RealtyMichigan Supreme Court· 2023-06-23
- People of Michigan v. Stanley JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals· 2023-09-21
Cites
72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 6,021×
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2009-03-25· cited 5,608×
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court· 1964-10-12· cited 3,703×
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 3,053×
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 1,828×
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 1,313×
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court· 1983-05-31· cited 1,238×
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 1,208×
- People v. FarrarNew York Court of Appeals· 1981-03-26· cited 1,012×
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court· 1897-03-22· cited 802×
- Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court· 2005-07-28· cited 747×
- Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, District 17Supreme Court· 2000-11-28· cited 558×
- U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court· 1995-05-22· cited 478×
- Ricketts v. AdamsonSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 439×
- Town of Newton v. RumerySupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 427×
- People v. DupreeMichigan Supreme Court· 2010-07-23· cited 378×
- Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1945-02-05· cited 359×
- Abela v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court· 2004-04-07· cited 339×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.