United States v. Honorable Jim R. Carrigan, United States v. Daniel G. Landry, United States v. Otis Elevator Company and Daniel G. Landry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that alt- hough “a court’s discretion is more limited under Rule48(a) than . . . under Rule 11(e),” courts are not required to grant Rule 48(a) motions to dismiss if “clearly contrary to manifest public interest,” and citing Fifth Circuit cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).