Skip to main content

People v. E.M.

Citations

  • 336 Ill. App. 3d 766
  • 784 N.E.2d 304
  • 271 Ill. Dec. 86
  • 2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 1253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that trial court’s finding that termination of a parent’s rights is in the child’s best interests will not be reversed unless it is against the manifest weight of the evidence
  • determining that trial court's finding that termination of a parent's rights is in the child's best interests will not be reversed unless it is against the manifest weight of the evidence
  • noting a trial court’s focus at a best-interest hearing is on “the child’s welfare and whether termination would improve the child’s future financial, social[,] and emotional atmosphere”
  • affirming termination by noting the trial court “properly concluded that the children’s need for a long-term, stable relationship outweighed the necessity of an available adoptive home immediately upon termination of respondent’s parental rights”
  • affirming termination by noting the trial court “properly concluded that the children’s need for a long-term, stable relationship outweighed the necessity of an available adoptive home immediately upon termination of respondent’s parental rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.