Skip to main content

People v. K.J.

Citations

  • 314 Ill. App. 3d 649
  • 732 N.E.2d 790
  • 247 Ill. Dec. 735
  • 2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “in determining reasonable efforts or reasonable progress the trial court must limit its findings to a specific time frame, whereas in determining the degree of interest, concern, or responsibility as to the welfare of the children no such time frame exists”
  • failure by trial court to follow procedural dictates of Juvenile Court Act did not cause it to lose its jurisdiction over cause
  • sufficient evidence of one statutory ground obviates the need to consider other grounds of unfitness
  • despite consistent visits with her child, the mother was unfit under ground 1(D) (b) where she failed to substantially comply with service plan directives that included participation in mental health services
  • dispositional order is final order from which appeal properly lies; parent's failure to file notice of appeal therefrom fails to perfect review of that order or of neglect proceedings
  • dispositional order is final order from which appeal properly lies; parent’s failure to file notice of appeal therefrom fails to perfect review of that order or of neglect proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rapp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. K.J.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.