Skip to main content
· 3/30/1994

Kaden v. Pucinski

Citations

  • 635 N.E.2d 468
  • 263 Ill. App. 3d 611
  • 200 Ill. Dec. 129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the court where the lawsuit was first filed should defer to the court that acquired jurisdiction second because the second court “has already entered a substantive ruling”
  • finding that the court where the lawsuit was first filed should defer to the court that acquired jurisdiction second because the second court \has already entered a substantive ruling\
  • denying plaintiffs motion to stay one of many taxpayer claims she had filed against county clerks of courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greiman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.