· 3/30/1994
Kaden v. Pucinski
Citations
- 635 N.E.2d 468
- 263 Ill. App. 3d 611
- 200 Ill. Dec. 129
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the court where the lawsuit was first filed should defer to the court that acquired jurisdiction second because the second court “has already entered a substantive ruling”
- finding that the court where the lawsuit was first filed should defer to the court that acquired jurisdiction second because the second court \has already entered a substantive ruling\
- denying plaintiffs motion to stay one of many taxpayer claims she had filed against county clerks of courts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greiman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.