Skip to main content
· 3/27/2003

People v. B.T.

Citations

  • 338 Ill. App. 3d 133
  • 272 Ill. Dec. 829
  • 788 N.E.2d 133
  • 2003 Ill. App. LEXIS 347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that due process requires only a preponderance of the evidence burden of proof in the best interest phase versus a clear and convincing evidence standard in the unfitness phase
  • holding that due process requires only a preponderance of the evidence burden of proof in the best interest phase versus a clear and convincing evidence standard in the unfitness phase
  • determining that because State failed to carry its burden of proof that termination of the respondent's parental rights was in the child's best interests, the trial court's decision terminating the respondent's rights was against the manifest weight of the evidence
  • determining that because State failed to carry its burden of proof that termination of the respondent's parental rights was in the child's best interests, the trial court's decision terminating the respondent's rights was against the manifest weight of the evidence
  • determining that because State failed to carry its burden of proof that termination of the respondent’s parental rights was in the child’s best interests, the trial court’s decision terminating the respondent’s rights was against the manifest weight of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Theis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.