Skip to main content
· 11/9/2009

In Re Jay H.

Citations

  • 918 N.E.2d 284
  • 335 Ill. Dec. 200
  • 395 Ill. App. 3d 1063

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that both a dispositional hearing and a best-interests hearing are functional equivalents, and as such both types of hearings “are subject to the same relaxed standard regarding the admission of evidence—that is, the formal rules of evidence do not apply”
  • “ ‘Although hearsay and other types of incompetent evidence may not be admissible at the adjudicatory hearing, they are admissible at the dispositional hearing.’ ” (quoting In re D.L., 226 Ill. App. 3d 177, 187 (1992))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steigmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.