Skip to main content

People v. Williams

Citations

  • 593 N.E.2d 968
  • 228 Ill. App. 3d 981
  • 171 Ill. Dec. 148
  • 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 758

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the evidence was not closely balanced where eyewitness evidence was corroborated by physical evidence and evidence provided from the police officers
  • distinguishing Threadgill where, inter alia, the prosecutor’s comments at - 15 - issue “were not repeated and lengthy arguments made throughout the State’s closing argument”
  • finding it was error to admit a witness’s prior consistent statement—that he “t[old] those police the same thing [he was] telling this jury” (internal quotation marks omitted)—because it corroborated the witness’s testimony on direct exam
  • finding it was error to admit a witness’s prior consistent statement—that he “t[old] those police the same thing [he was] telling this jury” (internal quotation marks omitted)—because it corroborated the witness’s testimony on direct exam
  • error is harmless where there is overwhelming evidence from which jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
  • error is harmless where there is overwhelming evidence from which jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

94 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.