People v. Blue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reversal was warranted when “the trial court allowed the guilty verdict to rest on considerations other than the evidence alone”
• holding that reversal was warranted when \the trial court allowed the guilty verdict to rest on considerations other than the evidence alone.\
• holding that an objection is only intended to state the fact of the objection and the evidentiary basis therefor, and that the State should not editorialize when making an objection
• holding that an objection is only intended to state the fact of the objection and the evidentiary basis therefor, and that the State should not editorialize when making an objection
• holding that reversal was warranted when \the trial court allowed the guilty verdict to rest on considerations other than the evidence alone.\
• holding that “a new trial is necessary in order to preserve the trustworthiness and reputation of the judicial process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).