Skip to main content
· 12/7/1978

People v. Spurlark

Citations

  • 384 N.E.2d 767
  • 67 Ill. App. 3d 186
  • 23 Ill. Dec. 860
  • 1978 Ill. App. LEXIS 3797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • counsel was not ready and willing where he was not immediately available to try the defendant’s case and he conditioned his representation - 16 - No. 1-22-0038 on a 30-day continuance
  • after allowing multiple continuances due to defense counsel’s unavailability for trial, trial court did not abuse its discretion by requiring defendant to proceed to trial with newly appointed attorney where defense counsel of defendant’s choosing was again unavailable for trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Linn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.