People v. Ashmus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commenting that \trial court might properly have prohibited such examination [regarding life imprisonment and no possibility of parole] altogether\
• abrogation on other grounds recognized 4 by People v. Daveggio and Michaud, 4 Cal. 5 th 790, 830 n.6 (2018
• no invocation where suspect sought to alter the course of questioning when incriminating witness was first mentioned; suspect‟s statements included „. . . now I ain‟t going to say no more.‟

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).