Skip to main content

People v. Williams

Citations

  • 16 Cal. 4th 153
  • 940 P.2d 710
  • 66 Cal. Rptr. 2d 123
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6192
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 10025
  • 1997 Cal. LEXIS 4410

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that decisions of lower federal courts interpreting federal law are not binding on state courts
  • recognizing that decisions of lower federal courts interpreting federal law are not binding on state courts
  • recognizing that decisions of lower federal courts interpreting federal law are not binding on state courts
  • recognizing that decisions of lower fed- eral courts interpreting federal law are not binding on state courts
  • concluding defendant was a mere “listening post” and that while the defendant and the informant talked about their cases together “nothing in the record suggests that [the informant] actively questioned defendant about defendant’s case”
  • “As we have recognized, in order to prevail on a Massiah claim involving use of a government informant, the defendant must demonstrate that . . . the informant (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Werdegar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

315 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

164 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.