Skip to main content

Seals v. State

Citations

  • 860 S.E.2d 419
  • 311 Ga. 739

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • tracing statutory history of OCGA § 5-6- 34 (a) and collecting cases confirming that interpretation
  • declaring a mistrial on one of multiple counts “meant the case was not final under [Georgia] precedent,” even where that count was placed on the trial court’s “dead docket”
  • “[D]ead-docketing a count leaves that 5 in this Court did not vest.7 count undecided and, thus, leaves the entire case pending in the court below. Such a case cannot be appealed as a final judgment under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1)[.]”
  • a criminal case is not final and appealable until the trial court “enters a written judgment on each count of the indictment”
  • a case is “no longer pending” when the trial court has resolved every count and left no issue remaining to be resolved
  • “We do not have the power to ignore the meaning of words, nor do we have the power to rewrite statutes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.