Skip to main content

Peña v. State

Citations

  • 98 P.3d 857
  • 2004 WY 115
  • 2004 WL 2239539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing clarification of an ambiguous invocation of the right to silence
  • “[W]arrantless searches and seizures are per se unreasonable unless they are justified by probable cause and established exceptions.”
  • “The existence of exigent circumstances is dependent upon all of the facts or circumstances viewed in their entirety.”
  • \A reply brief is not the place for an appellant to present new issues.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Golden, Hill, Kite, Lehman, Voigt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

76 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.