Skip to main content

Winters v. State

Citations

  • 446 P.3d 191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging the danger of the State presenting “numerous witnesses to repeat the victim’s allegations, thereby piling on consistent statements” (citations and quotation marks omitted)
  • Defendant failed to identify what helpful points could have been made on cross- examination had his counsel interviewed the State’s DNA expert.
  • we consider whether trial counsel’s acts or omissions were outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance
  • the district court’s admission of the victim’s out-of-court statements to a forensic interviewer and a police officer was proper because the statements were made in a manner expected in the early 6 stages of a sexual abuse investigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boomgaarden, Davis, Fox, Gray, Kautz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.