AEP Energy Services Gas Holding Co. v. Bank of America, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that leave to amend should be denied where motion to amend was filed after defendant had filed summary judgment papers based on existing claims
• holding that materials not submitted to the court until after summary judgment motions had been filed failed to create a genuine dispute of material fact
• noting that plaintiffs contradictory filings were “not submitted ... to the district court until after summary judgment motions were filed”
• finding sufficient prejudice where plaintiff sought leave to amend years after filing and after summary judgment motions were fully briefed
• affirming denial of motion to amend filed three years after the case began and after motions for summary judgment had been filed
• affirming denial of leave to amend where discovery had closed and summary judgment papers had been filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).