· 5/25/2012
Panther Partners Inc. v. Ikanos Communications, Inc.
Citations
- 681 F.3d 114
- 2012 WL 1889622
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10726
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Item 303 imposes “a disclosure duty where a trend, demand, commitment, event or uncertainty is both (1) presently known to management and (2) reasonably likely to have material effects on the registrant's financial condition or results of operations.”
- noting that the issuer “was aware of the ‘uncertainty’ ” of possible returns related to its product’s defects and that such “ ‘known uncertainties’ could materially impact revenues”
- explaining that “Section 11 imposes strict liability on issuers and signatories, and negligence liability on underwriters”
- explaining that when assessing futility, “we consider the proposed amendments along with the remainder of the complaint”
- finding sufficient knowledge where company knew that it would have to accept returns of all product or else take substantial action
- equating the futility standard for granting leave to replead with whether proposed allegations would survive a motion to dismiss
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Jacobs, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.