Skip to main content
· 5/25/2012

Panther Partners Inc. v. Ikanos Communications, Inc.

Citations

  • 681 F.3d 114
  • 2012 WL 1889622
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Item 303 imposes “a disclosure duty where a trend, demand, commitment, event or uncertainty is both (1) presently known to management and (2) reasonably likely to have material effects on the registrant's financial condition or results of operations.”
  • noting that the issuer “was aware of the ‘uncertainty’ ” of possible returns related to its product’s defects and that such “ ‘known uncertainties’ could materially impact revenues”
  • explaining that “Section 11 imposes strict liability on issuers and signatories, and negligence liability on underwriters”
  • explaining that when assessing futility, “we consider the proposed amendments along with the remainder of the complaint”
  • finding sufficient knowledge where company knew that it would have to accept returns of all product or else take substantial action
  • equating the futility standard for granting leave to replead with whether proposed allegations would survive a motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Jacobs, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.