Skip to main content

Parry v. Parry

Citations

  • 933 So. 2d 9
  • 2006 WL 1113520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the trial court properly treated vested stock options as marital assets and included them in the equitable distribution scheme
  • stating that \an award given as an incentive for future service would be marital only to the extent that the service is thereafter performed before the end of the marriage\
  • requiring the trial court to consider regular and continuous bonuses in calculating income for the purpose of child support
  • remanding for trial court to allocate, value, and distribute marital portion of stock option awards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Northcutt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.