Chehab v. Hamilton-Chehab

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for the trial court to make findings where the record was unclear whether and how much the former husband received from a brokerage account
• noting wife’s shares of restricted stock granted during the marriage vest and expire at different times, including post-decree, and unvested shares are “in the nature of deferred compensation” and “a marital asset”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).