Drew v. Drew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring the trial court to consider regular and continuous bonuses in calculating income for the purposes of alimony and child support
• “[W]hen a trial court calculates income for the purpose of awarding child support or alimony, it may not exclude from consideration bonuses that are regular and continuous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hedden v. Hedden
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-03-12· cited 8×
• DiNARDO v. DiNARDO
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-08· cited 2×
• Barlow v. Barlow
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-08-16· cited 1×
• Edge v. Edge
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-06-15

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Parry v. Parry
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-28· cited 14×