Supreme Court of Florida· 6/16/1994
Parker v. State
Citations
- 641 So. 2d 369
- 1994 WL 261458
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the cause challenges
- concluding the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the cause challenges
- explaining that “[t]he purpose of the felony-murder statute ‘is to protect the public from inherently dangerous situations caused by the commission of the felony.’” (quoting State v. Hacker, 510 So.2d 304, 306 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986))
- explaining that “[t]he purpose of the felony-murder statute ‘is to protect the public from inherently dangerous situations caused by the commission of the felony.’ ” (quoting State v. Hacker, 510 So. 2d 304, 306 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-03-15· cited 151×
- Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-04-15· cited 108×
- Busby v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-02-03· cited 105×
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-06-02· cited 93×
- Hernandez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-30· cited 61×
- Archer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-03-14· cited 54×
- People v. HuynhCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-12-20· cited 47×
- Leonard Patrick Gonzalez, Jr. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2014-04-10· cited 46×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-12-17· cited 43×
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-22· cited 39×
- Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-07-18· cited 39×
- Banks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-06-03· cited 32×
- Matarranz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-09-26· cited 32×
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-04-25· cited 30×
- Martinez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-10· cited 26×
- Kopsho v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-05-24· cited 23×
- Rivera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-31· cited 20×
- Christopher Dean v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2017-08-31· cited 20×
- State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-07· cited 15×
- Van Poyck v. SingletarySupreme Court of Florida· 1998-05-14· cited 15×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
- Bottoson v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1984-10-01· cited 793×
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 530×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-11-14· cited 320×
- Newlon v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 261×
- Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-06-14· cited 233×
- Singer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1959-02-13· cited 190×
- Jent v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-12-03· cited 173×
- Lusk v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-01-26· cited 162×
- Grossman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-18· cited 151×
- Breedlove v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-03-04· cited 148×
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-10-27· cited 128×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-12-20· cited 126×
- In re LucasSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 112×
- Sochor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-05-06· cited 103×
- Duest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-01-10· cited 82×
- Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-10-22· cited 73×
- Pentecost v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-06-29· cited 63×
- Haliburton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-04-05· cited 60×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-10-01· cited 53×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.