Washington Supreme Court· 3/1/1990
Pappas v. Holloway
Citations
- 787 P.2d 30
- 114 Wash. 2d 198
- 1990 Wash. LEXIS 19
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the protection of the work product rule continues after litigation has terminated
- characterizing waiver analysis in part as limiting the attorney-client privilege to “the purpose for which it exists.”
- balancing attorney-client privilege and the right to contribution in favor of the client
- privilege encourages free and open communications by assuring that communications will not be disclosed to others directly or indirectly
- privilege encourages free and open communications by assuring that communications will not be disclosed to others directly or indirectly
- privilege encourages free and open communications by assuring that communications will not be disclosed to others directly or indirectly
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dolliver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dawson v. DalyWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-18· cited 167×
- Limstrom v. LadenburgWashington Supreme Court· 1998-10-01· cited 130×
- Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court· 2007-12-27· cited 125×
- Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court· 2007-12-27· cited 122×
- Zabin v. PicciottoMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2008-11-18· cited 73×
- Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-07-25· cited 71×
- Fischel & Kahn, Ltd. v. Van Straaten Gallery, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court· 2000-01-21· cited 68×
- Matter of Firestorm 1991Washington Supreme Court· 1996-05-16· cited 62×
- In re Firestorm 1991Washington Supreme Court· 1996-05-16· cited 59×
- Dietz v. DoeWashington Supreme Court· 1997-04-24· cited 57×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LeeArizona Supreme Court· 2000-12-08· cited 56×
- State v. PawlykWashington Supreme Court· 1990-10-25· cited 52×
- Dever v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-02-18· cited 50×
- Redding v. Virginia Mason Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-08-15· cited 43×
- Harris v. DrakeWashington Supreme Court· 2004-10-14· cited 42×
- Elia v. PiferCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-09-03· cited 41×
- Snowden v. Connaught Laboratories, Inc.D. Kansas· 1991-02-14· cited 39×
- In re the Detention of WestWashington Supreme Court· 2011-05-05· cited 26×
- In Re Detention of WestWashington Supreme Court· 2011-05-05· cited 25×
- Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-03-09· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.