· 3/18/2003
Harris v. Drake
Citations
- 65 P.3d 350
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a subsequent third party claimant cannot compel the production of the PIP file because the PIP file, including the IME report, was the privileged work product of the insurer
- a subsequent third party claimant cannot compel the production of the PIP file because the PIP file, including the IME report, was the privileged work product of the insurer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morgan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.