Skip to main content
· 3/18/2003

Harris v. Drake

Citations

  • 65 P.3d 350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a subsequent third party claimant cannot compel the production of the PIP file because the PIP file, including the IME report, was the privileged work product of the insurer
  • a subsequent third party claimant cannot compel the production of the PIP file because the PIP file, including the IME report, was the privileged work product of the insurer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morgan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.