Matter of Firestorm 1991

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the principles embodied in CR 11, CR 26(g), and CR 37 to CR 26(b) violations
• applying the principles embodied in CR 11, CR 26(g), and CR 37 to CR 26(b) violations
• applying the principles embodied in CR 11, CR 26(g), and CR 37 to CR 26(b) violations
• Disqualification of counsel as a sanction for violating CR 26(b)(5) was too extreme and disproportionate to the rule violation; the trial court should have considered less severe sanctions.
• “Delay in filing 13 [a] motion to disqualify is suggestive of its use for purely tactical purposes and could be 14 the sole grounds for denying [the motion].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).