Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 10/7/2010

Palka v. Shelton

Citations

  • 623 F.3d 447
  • 31 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 492
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 20708
  • 2010 WL 3911340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Merit Board disciplinary process satisfies Cook County's procedural due process obligation
  • holding that internal publica- tion of reasons for police officer’s discharge could not support occupational liberty claim
  • concluding that a police investigation did not violate due process merely because it did not conform to internal department procedures
  • holding that the Merit Board disciplinary process satisfies Cook County’s procedural due process obligation
  • holding that “[b]ecause the County, not the City, was Palka's employer, Palka cannot sue the City and its employees for depriving him of due process in connection with the loss of his employment.”
  • holding that “[b]ecause the County, not the City, was Palka’s employer, Palka cannot sue the City and its employees for depriving him of due process in connection with the loss of his employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Kanne, and Sykes, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Palka v. Shelton

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.