William Hudson and Bishop Pamon v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that officers must be given an opportunity to explain their sides of the story before being terminated to avoid mistakes
• holding that officers must be given an opportunity to explain their sides of the story before being terminated to avoid mistakes
• concluding that a collective bargaining agreement satisfied due process, even when union refused to initiate appellate procedures on plaintiffs' behalf, because the plaintiffs \could have sued the union\
• concluding that a collective bargaining agreement satisfied due process, even when union refused to initiate appellate procedures on plaintiffs’ behalf, because the 31 plaintiffs “could have sued the union”
• “[A] state cannot be held to have violated due process requirements when it has made procedural protection available and the plaintiff has simply refused to avail himself of them”
• \The loss of a job is an extremely significant deprivation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).