Skip to main content
· 4/26/1982

Bohumil J. Dusanek v. Joseph P. Hannon, Raymond C. Principe, John O'donnell, M.D., and the Board of Education of the City of Chicago

Citations

  • 677 F.2d 538
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19807
  • 4 Educ. L. Rep. 409

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[A] state cannot be held to have violated due process requirements when it has made procedural protection available and the plaintiff has simply refused to avail himself of them.\
  • “The availability of recourse to a constitutionally sufficient administrative procedure satisfies due process requirements if the complainant merely declines or fails to take advantage of the administrative procedure.”
  • “[A] state cannot be held to have violated due process requirements when it has made procedural protection available and the plaintiff has simply refused to avail himself of them.”
  • “[A] state cannot be held to have violated due process requirements when it has made procedural protection available and the plaintiff has simply refused to avail himself of them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pell, Markey, Sprecher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.