Skip to main content
· 6/9/2005

Martina Montgomery v. Thomas P. Stefaniak, Jr., Salvador Vasquez, and Clarence D. Murray

Citations

  • 410 F.3d 933
  • 23 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 83
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10715
  • 2005 WL 1357210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding county probation officer had no property interest in continued employment because Indiana law provides that such officers serve “at the pleasure of the appointing court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Evans, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.